Grants for Businesses from Federal Government Grants Assistance Programs! - government grants Questions

"How to secure your share of free grants money! - government grants Questions"

Question #1:

Influence of islam on the west?

Islam’s war against the infidels is not going to be defeated by guns or bombs. Force is merely the final solution to settling conflicts, but Islam’s violence is for now only the tip of the iceberg of a much larger campaign to make the world into an Islamic domain.
While we fight with police actions and holding elections, the Islamists are seizing control of weak governments by force or by means of democratic elections… They are conquering African nations and staging civil wars in pacific ones too! They are importing millions of Muslims to Europe and America as Europe’s ‘Palestinians’ for a coming European Intifada. They are rewriting history to claim that the Arab explorers originally discovered America and Australia giving them claim to the land. They are aggressively evangelizing hundreds of thousands a year to Islam through misleading claims.
What we believe is a war is merely a minor skirmish in a global conquest! While we spend billions of dollars and thousands of lives to stabilize a single Muslim country, dozens of non-Muslim countries are being destabilized day by day. The true battle against Islam is not a military one; it is a cultural one. For Islam, it is a religious conflict for a global empire, intent on transforming every aspects of life into one defined by Islam (Islamic Shariah).
For us, it is about preserving our way of life.
The cartoon controversy woke many Europeans to the fact that free speech and many of the other attributes of democracy that they take for granted are incompatible with Islam. Under relentless pressure of multiculturalism, Muslims and we are increasingly deciding that our way of life has to bow to theirs. This is the ultimate victory of Islam!!!
Not the fall of the Twin Towers or any single act of terrorism is as great a victory for Islam as when our own government and press repeat their propagandas and muzzle their critics. This represents the submission of the West to their rule…! It turns Islam into the only legally sanctioned religion in Western nations that have long instituted separations of the Church and State.
Islam cannot be criticized by any public figure(s) without violence quickly following?
Islam cannot be criticized by the press without violence quickly following?
No disrespect, real or perceived, towards Islam can be tolerated either?
This is the lesson Muslim violence is teaching in the West, and much of their media, politicians and clergy are quickly becoming obedient students. Criticism of Islam by individuals will get you condemned as a bigot by those peoples, who are, for all intents and purposes, collaborating with our new tyrants!

While entertainers, academics and pundits of a liberalized West are free to criticize and impugn Christianity and Judaism, Islam is a No-Go Zone!!! While Judaism and Christianity cannot be taught in schools of the liberal West, Islam can be and is...! Muslim religious artifacts can be displayed, Muslim religion taught and its holy books present, whereas those of other religions cannot. This elevates Islam to a special status. It gives Muslims power over other religions and they use that power to their whims!

Question #2:

Could a dictator/president give his daughter a title?

Do you think if a man was a President with absolute power like the Presidents in some dictatorships that he could create his daughter a Princess for her 16th birthday? Couldn't he issue out a decree if he was the head of the country with the government being powerless? Do you think that royal courts would recognize her title being granted by a foreign government? Just curious as to what could happen if this happened?

Question #3:

How does one vote when neither party is what you want and third part candidates have little chance of winning?

I have a hard time voting, because there are things from each political party that I like, all of equal importance. Both parties, democrats and republicans, seem to be so extreme. Democrats are at the extreme left and Republicans are at the extreme right. And I don't fit into either of those camps. I've tried voting Libertarian or Green, but I know they have very little chance of actually winning and I feel like I am wasting my vote.

Here's my dilemmas.

I don't support, nor am I against same sex marriage. I don't believe it is the role of the government to say who can and can not marry. I believe the government should grant everyone civil unions, and that the religious institution of your choosing can grant you a marriage. Since I believe marriage is a covenant between you, your spouse, and God I don't see the validity of marriages granted by the government. I feel VERY STRONGLY on this issue.

I don't really like abortion, and I think it's wrong, but I don't believe it's the government's role to regulate what goes on between a woman and her doctor. I feel VERY STRONGLY about this issue.

I believe that all citizens, who have not been convicted of a crime or proven themselves to be a danger to society, should have the unrestricted right to own weapons.

I believe in lower taxes and lower spending, not the higher taxes/higher spending of the Democratic party or the lower taxes/higher spending of the Republican party.

Who can I vote for?

Question #4:

I need to know my mothers mating name?

I need to know my mothers mating name for a work application. I don't know my mothers mating name. Will the local government buildings grant me to that information?

Question #5:

I have an amazing new invention?

I want my Ideas to turn into Profit fast.

I am a fifteen year old boy living in the UK. I strongly believe that I am in possession of a great new idea which would sell and in return I would become a millionaire if not a multi-millionaire but first I need to know without telling you my idea yet, copyright, patent non disclosure statement etc..., would the government back me up and give me a grant as I do not have much money and I do not know any one whom is wealthy.

Maybe you could point me in the right direction give me a business partner maybe thank you.

Also should I show my idea to a manufacture HQ or just walk into a shop like Argos or something because I really want to become a millionaire and I am certain I have the idea/invention to pull it off just need money, advice and connections.

Thank you.

Your sincerely
to be famous inventor and millionaire.

Please answer the questions all please thank you and no I am not telling you my invention.

Question #6:

Do HIV positive persons receive a grant or other government benefits in South Africa?

Do South African citizens infected with HIV receive any financial aid/grants or special special priviledges or benefits from the government? If so, are there website links that you can provide me with that have more information about these benefits?

Question #7:

We hear so much about Stephen Hawking, but not this guy?

Physicist Receives Million-Pound Prize for Predicting a 'Hypercosmic God'

by Jeffrey Tomkins, Ph.D. *

On March 16, 2009, the Templeton Foundation announced the winner of its annual 1 million pound sterling (1.42 million USD) prize, an amount that exceeds the payoff of the prestigious Nobel Prize.1 Bernard d’Espagnat, a French physicist at the University of Paris-Sud, will receive the award from the Duke of Edinburgh at Buckingham Palace at an elaborate ceremony in May. Dr. d’Espagnat was awarded the prize for his work using theoretical physics to predict the reality of a hypercosmic god, who exists outside of the physical universe.

The Templeton Prize was started in 1972 by Sir John Templeton, an American-born entrepreneur and businessman. Templeton’s goal was to provide monetary resources for research and discovery in science and philosophy, with a focus towards university faculty. Candidates for this award have typically performed research involving a strong metaphysical or spiritual side that very few researchers are willing to tackle.

Dr. D’Espagnat received the recognition specifically for his work in “concept reality,” an off-shoot from his decades of work in quantum mechanics. The goal of quantum mechanics is to provide a complete description/model of the physical world. However, if something exists beyond scientifically predictable phenomena, then there must be some other reality underlying the natural world, another dimension that is not based on time, distance, or physical constraints.

Additionally, events in one dimension are able to simultaneously affect events in the other dimension and distance is not an issue, even though the second dimension is non-local. D’Espagnat’s current hypothesis is that some unknowable divine entity operates in this underlying realm/dimension. In other words, theoretical physics now predicts the reality of a hypercosmic god.

In this model, there is no way to know this divine being or connect with him in a meaningful way. D’Espagnat’s notion of the impersonal/unknowable aspect of this god is not actually predicted by the model, but simply represents his own opinion on the matter.

It is interesting that one of the hottest fields in theoretical physics points towards a Divine Being or God and also predicts God’s divine attributes of omnipotence, immortality, omniscience, and omnipresence. What is even more exciting is that all of these findings line up with the description of God in the Holy Bible, except for one thing—He is knowable and we can connect with Him in a meaningful way through the forgiveness of sin available through His Son Jesus Christ.2

Although it is exciting that modern scientific research clearly points towards God, it does not take millions of dollars in government grants coupled with years of laborious research to prove His existence and know what He is like. His Divine attributes are clearly outlined in the Bible.

Click Here

Question #8:

OK, you conservatives, is this correct:?

"A longtime adviser and close confidant of President Bush funneled millions of dollars in U.S. government grants to radical Islamist organizations, many of whose leaders have been convicted or indicted in terrorism cases in the United States, respected terrorism expert Steven Emerson told Congress last week.

“When Ms. [Karen] Hughes was appointed as undersecretary of state for public diplomacy and public affairs, she set the tone to continue a disastrous policy of outreach with Islamist partners,” Emerson told the House International Relations Committee. ..."

see the rest of the article at Click Here

Question #9:

im from the UK and want to study at university in the USA?

hey,
im from the UK and i want to study at university in the USA when i am done with 6th form.
i start 6th form on tuesday of next week.
so i have 2 years to save up and really think about what i want to study etc... but do USA universitys run the same as British one's. As England has Grants that the government provides for them so they are able to afford university, but then the student eventually has to pay it back when they have a secure job. does America do this?
i know i would have to pay for accomadation,
general living,
fuel for a car, clothing
etc....

i am 16 now and finish 6th form when i am 18.
should i take a gap year afterwards, in a full time job, saving for university in the US. Then go to University when i am 20?
i want to move to America anyway
but 20 seems a little old to go to Uni!!!
lol

Question #10:

How do i get a Government grant to start an green energy company with wind turbines?

I really want to start an energy company, using the big wind turbines. I have a location which i think may be suitable. I was wondering if i could get a government grant or loan to where i could make my dream possible. can anyone help me to understand the process?

Question #11:

can someone please tell me what this poem is about?

BOLD JACK DONAHOE
(Anonymous)

'Twas of a valiant highwayman and outlaw of disdain
Who'd scorn to live in slavery or wear a convicts chain;
His name it was Jack Donahoe of courage and renown -
He'd scorn to live in slavery or humble to the Crown.
This bold, undaunted highwayman, as you may understand,
Was banished for his natural life from Erin's happy land.
In Dublin city of renown, where his first breath he drew,
It's there they titled him the brave and bold Jack Donahoe.

He scarce had been a twelvemonth on the Australian shore,
When he took to the highway, as oft he had before,
Brave MacNamara, Underwood, Webber and Warmsley too,
These were the four associates of bold Jack Donahoe.
As Jack and his companions roved out one afternoon,
Not thinking that the pains of death would overcome so soon,
To their surprise five horse police appeared all in their view,
And in quick time they did advance to take Jack Donahoe.
"Come, come, you cowardly rascals, oh, do not run away!
We'll fight them man to man, my boys, their number's only three;
For I'd rather range the bush around, like dingo or kangaroo,
Than work one hour for Government," said bold Jack Donahoe.
'Oh, no,' said cowardly Walmsley, 'to that I won't agree;
I see they're still advancing us - their numbers more than three.
And if we wait we'll be too late, the battle we will rue.'
'Then begone from me, you cowardly dog,' replied Jack Donahoe.
The Sergeant of the horse police, discharged his car-a-bine,
And called aloud to Donahoe, 'Will you fight or resign?'
'Resign, no, no! I never will, until your cowardly crew,
For today I'll fight with all my might,' cried bold Jack Donahoe.
The Sergeant then, in a hurry his party to divide,
Placed one to fire in front of him, and another on each side;
The Sergeant and the Corporal, they both fired too,
Till the fatal ball had pierced the heart of bold Jack Donahoe.
Six rounds he fought those horse police before the fatal ball,
Which pierced his heart with cruel smart, caused Donahoe to fall;
And as he closed his mournful eyes he bade this world adieu,
Saying, 'Good people all, pray for the soul of poor Jack Donahoe.
' There were Freincy, Grant, bold Robin Hood, Brennan and O'hare;
With Donahoe this highwayman none of them could compare.
But now he's gone to Heaven, I hope, with saints and angels too -
May the Lord have mercy on the soul of Brave Jack Donahoe.

Question #12:

Are there grants for learning disabled people?

I have ADHD which makes school alot harder for me. Is there anything that the government or any organization can give me to make my finances easier on me?

Question #13:

What does this article mean??...(brief summary please)?

Anti-abortion Group Targets Democrats In Radio Ads
Anti-abortion Group Relies On Supreme Court Ruling To Call For Defeat Of 3 Democrats
Font size Print E-mail Share
(AP) WASHINGTON (AP) - An anti-abortion group plans to air radio ads in three congressional races calling for the defeat of Democratic incumbents, among the first ads to capitalize on a Supreme Court ruling this year that freed corporations to directly influence elections.

The group, AUL Action, is targeting Democratic Reps. John Boccieri of Ohio, Christopher Carney of Pennsylvania and Baron Hill of Indiana. AUL Action is the legislative arm of the nonprofit Americans United for Life.

The ads cross a new threshold in campaign communication and embrace the latitude granted by the Supreme Court in its 5-4 decision in January to increase the power of corporations and unions to sway government decisions.

Ad spending is on a record pace as outside groups raise more money from corporations, individuals and unions. As the November general election nears, political strategists believe more groups will follow AUL's path.

AUL Action is incorporated as a nonprofit under section 501(c)4 of the tax code. As such, it now enjoys the expanded rights granted by the court. Before that ruling, groups such as AUL were limited to airing "issue ads" that drew attention to candidates positions but could not recommend whether voters should vote them in or out of office.

Audio clips of the ads were obtained by The Associated Press from a Republican strategist not affiliated with Americans United. The group confirmed the placement of the ads.

Last month, AUL relied on the court's decision to endorse Colorado Republican Jane Norton for the Senate. Norton eventually lost to tea party-backed candidate Ken Buck, a county prosecutor.

AUL Action says Boccieri, Carney and Hill are the first of about a dozen members of Congress it intends to target with ads. The one-minute ads are scheduled to begin airing Friday for one week. They criticize Boccieri, Hill and Carney for voting for President Barack Obama's health care law. In a statement, AUL Action President Charmaine Yoest said the vote amounted to "the largest expansion of federal funding of abortion ever."

"They will not be able to hide from that vote any longer," she said.

Before the bill passed, Obama signed an executive order affirming long-standing restrictions on taxpayer-funded abortions.

Under the law, private plans in new insurance markets opening for business in 2014 can cover abortion, but payment must come from enrollees themselves, not from federal tax credits that will be offered to make premiums more affordable.

In the ads, a female narrators says, "The life of an innocent child may not matter" to Boccieri, Hill and Carney.

"It's time to send someone to Washington who shares our values, not Nancy Pelosi's," the ads say.

(This version CORRECTS to show Boccieri represents Ohio, not Indiana.)
&&&& How does this affect the community or the U.S as a whole

Question #14:

Is it possible for a muslim to be a Zionist?

I'm a muslim but I also believe that Jews should have the right to establish their country and homeland. Personally, I admire Jews. Most are very pleasant, kind and educated people. Also, Israel has made strides in the scientific and bio-medical communities and has been contributing vastly ever since it's establishment. I also believe there are many slanders against Israel's policies against the Palestinians, who have been shown many humanitarian aid by Israel. Also, while many Arab countries refuse Jews and Israelis many of their basic human rights let alone allow them in positions of power, many Arabs have been given seats and political power within the Israeli government's infrastructure. Israel defends itself against terrorist organizations such as hamas and hizbollah, granted a couple of innocents have been killed in the crossfire, but collateral damage is inevitable in such cases correct?

Why is admitting these facts automatically make muslims label me a non-muslim zionist jew? Isn't it possible to be both a zionist (supporter of Israel) and a muslim?

Question #15:

Are the Global Warming emperor's robes invisible, or is he naked?

Isn't it incredible that if the East Anglia leak hadn't happened, most of the world would be floating in new "save the world" taxes?
It turns out that dozens of "scientists" that were a part of the IPCC "clique"... intentionally built up extremely weak, and sometimes outright false information and data to be able to come to the conclusion they wanted to reach in the first place!

excerpt...

The global-warming establishment took a body blow this week, as the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change received a stunning rebuke from a top-notch independent investigation.

For two decades, the IPCC has spearheaded efforts to convince the world's governments that man-made carbon emissions pose a threat to the global temperature equilibrium -- and to civilization itself. IPCC reports, collated from the work of hundreds of climate scientists and bureaucrats, are widely cited as evidence for the urgent need for drastic action to "save the planet."

But the prestigious InterAcademy Council, an independent association of "the best scientists and engineers worldwide" (as the group's own Web site puts it) formed in 2000 to give "high-quality advice to international bodies," has finished a thorough review of IPCC practices -- and found them badly wanting.

"Some scientists invited by the IPCC to review the 2007 report before it was published questioned the Himalayan claim. But those challenges 'were not adequately considered,' the InterAcademy Council's investigation said, and the projection was included in the final report."

Yet the Himalayan claim wasn't based on peer-reviewed scientific data, or on any data -- but on speculation in a phone interview by a single scientist.

Was science even a real concern for the IPCC? In January, the Sunday Times of London reported that, based in large part on the fraudulent glacier story, "[IPCC Chairman] Rajendra Pachauri's Energy and Resources Institute, based in New Delhi, was awarded up to 310,000 pounds by the Carnegie Corp. . . . and the lion's share of a 2.5 million pound EU grant funded by European taxpayers."

Thus, the Times concluded, "EU taxpayers are funding research into a scientific claim about glaciers that any ice researcher should immediately recognize as bogus."

What does the best evidence now tell us? That man-made global warming is a mere hypothesis that has been inflated by both exaggeration and downright malfeasance, fueled by the awarding of fat grants and salaries to any scientist who'll produce the "right" results.

Read more: Click Here

Question #16:

Financial Aid Refund Check?

Okay well I know that if you get government aid or scholarships and there is money left over after all expenses are paid you are usually entitled to a FA refund check.

But here's the thing with me, the grants I received covered most of my expenses but I just became eligible for a scholarship that would leave alot of money left over. If the checks are coming in a few weeks but my scholarship doesn't go into effect until the week of, will I still get a check for the left over money? and if not, will I get that money in refund check from the spring semester?

Any help is appreciated, thanks.

Question #17:

apart from NEIS what are the possibilities for a sole trader just starting a business?

I got my ABN in July and am now enrolled in the NEIS training program.
Are there any other kinds of help available from federal, state or local governments organisations ?
or any private help (mentoring, sponsorships, grants and so on) ?

thanks for your input it will be greatly appreciated !
thanks Bec.. went to your websites and subscribed to a couple mailing lists (sent also an email through the contact us form on hatching online)
Keep in touch !

Question #18:

Would you vote for a Conservative that wanted to deregulate, cut taxes, get rid of the IRS,?

believes that mandated hospital emergency treatment for illegal aliens should be ceased and that assistance from charities should instead be sought because there should be no federal mandates on providing health care for illegal aliens

believes children born in the U.S. to illegal aliens should not be granted automatic birthright citizenship.[56] He has called for a new Constitutional amendment to revise fourteenth amendment principles and "end automatic birthright citizenship,"[57] and believes that welfare issues are directly tied to the illegal immigration problem

climate change is not a "major problem threatening civilization

rejects universal health care, believing that the more government interferes in medicine, the higher prices rise and the less efficient care becomes

repeal of the seventeenth amendment
Strongly pro-life, feels it should be left up to the states to decide
believes that Racism is simply an ugly form of collectivism, the mindset that views humans strictly as members of groups rather than individuals. Racists believe that all individuals who share superficial physical characteristics are alike: as collectivists, racists think only in terms of groups. By encouraging Americans to adopt a group mentality, the advocates of so-called 'diversity' actually perpetuate racism. Their obsession with racial group identity is inherently racist
would substantially reduce the government's role in individual lives and in the functions of foreign and domestic states; he says Republicans have lost their commitment to limited government and have become the party of big government.[74] He would eliminate many federal government agencies, such as the U.S. Department of Education,[75] the U.S. Department of Energy, the U.S. Department of Commerce,[76] the US Department of Health and Human Services,[76] the Department of Homeland Security, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), the Interstate Commerce Commission and the Internal Revenue Service
Obamabot..

Your answer indicates that you know nothing about Ron Paul.... because this is his platform..

Funny how people support people yet know nothing about them

Question #19:

What is he able to sue me for?

Just under a year ago, this guy from my school (he turned 18 this July) thought it'd be fun to discriminate against me by pretending to be gay, asking me to do things with him, and basically harass me so I would admit to being gay. I played along with him cause I thought he may be gay, and since I'm not, I didn't want to hurt his feelings.

We then spoke on msn one day and I said "I regret how things left off between us" cause I genuinely thought he was an okay guy. At that point, he started acting all weird again and so I told him that I am going to expose him for harassing me on Facebook by sharing our conversations in a note. I messaged him through Facebook inbox about 3 times so he would stop.

Later, I get a message from him saying that he has spoken to his lawyer and he is going to sue me because I have made fake accounts on Facebook (totally untrue), threatened him, harassed him, and discriminated. He also said I violated section 15 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms:

"15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability."

As far as I know, this particular section of the Charter doesn't apply to me as it's directed towards government bodies or an employer who has discriminated you and as a result, you have lost pay.

So at this point, I'm feeling confident that he doesn't have a lawyer because no lawyer would tell him he could sue me with that section of the Charter. However, my friend recently called him (a month after I received a message saying he wanted to sue me) and he told my friend that he is serious and isn't going to back out of the case because he will lose too much money.

At this point, I am worried as hell. I am a minor - he'd have to go for my parents. As well, I don't see how there is any money involved here for him to sue me for. He doesn't suffer from any depression and it's not like he is on meds cause of this.

Can he sue me?

ALSO: In the first message he sent me where he said he wanted to sue me, he said....

"im not worried at all bud. everyone's looking to sue out there...and when opportunities come by why not take them for granted. take care:)"

I have the email saved and I believe this will prove that he is out to sue for the wrong reasons - even revenge - as he isn't suffering from my actions. So what the hell can he sue for - I never posted anything!